Inaccuracy of the intramedullary femoral guide: traditional instrumentation lacks precision and accuracy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to utilize a large-scale biomorphometric computer tomography (CT) database to determine the desirable starting point and angle for placement of the femoral intramedullary rod in the sagittal plane. METHODS: A CT-based modeling and analytics system (SOMA, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) was used to evaluate 1029 entire-femur CT scans. From this, 19,464 simulations were run to test whether a 20 cm intramedullary rod, with a radius of 4 mm, would successfully pass through the femoral canal before contacting cortical bone. First, modelling included varying angles from 0-6 degrees in the sagittal plane, at 1-degree intervals. Next, the start point was adjusted with an assumed 3 degrees of induced flexion in comparison to the mechanical axis. RESULTS: A total of 5012 simulations were able to place the femoral intramedullary rod 20 cm into the canal. The angle of the rod that created the highest proportion of successful jig placement was at a 3-degree angle of induced flexion to the orthogonal plane of the transepicondylar axis (TEA), with 33.7% successful jig placements. The starting point for the greatest proportion of successful guide placements was 48.5% along the distance between the sTEA, slightly closer to the lateral side. In the AP plane, the average distance to the ideal start point was 12.1 mm anterior to the PCL. CONCLUSION: By examining over a thousand femoral CT scans, an angle of 3 degrees of induced flexion was identified in the sagittal plane with the highest proportion of successful placement of an intramedullary rod before cortical contact. It is important to note the high rate of failure in completely inserting the 20 mm rod. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: This is a prospective computer based model.

Accuracy of Reference Axes for Femoral Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Computed Tomography-Based Study of 2,128 Femora.

BACKGROUND: Many reference axes are used to evaluate rotation of the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty, including the Whiteside line, surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA), anatomical transepicondylar axis (aTEA), posterior condylar axis externally rotated 3° (PCA+3°ER), sulcus line, and femoral transverse axis (FTA). There is no consensus about which of these axes is most accurate. METHODS: The Stryker Orthopaedic Modeling and Analytics (SOMA) database was used to identify 2,128 entire-femur computed tomography (CT) scans. The Whiteside line, aTEA, PCA+3°ER, sulcus line, and FTA were constructed according to published guidelines. Every axis was compared with the sTEA, which is widely regarded as the gold standard reference axis for rotation of the distal part of the femur but has low intraobserver and interobserver reliability intraoperatively. RESULTS: The PCA+3°ER differed from the sTEA by a mean (and standard deviation) of 0.60° ± 1.64°; it was the most accurate but also had the highest degree of intersubject variability. The mean PCA-sTEA angle was 2.40°, close to the accepted "rule of thumb" of 3°. This value was significantly higher in women (2.64° ± 1.74°) than in men (2.18° ± 1.52°; p < 0.001). The Whiteside line differed from the sTEA by a mean of 1.90° ± 1.38°, and the sulcus line differed from the sTEA by a mean of 1.94° ± 1.49°; neither of these values varied significantly with sex or ethnicity. The FTA differed from the sTEA by a mean of 2.04° ± 1.50°. Least accurate was the aTEA, which differed from the sTEA by a mean of 2.05° ± 1.33°. The combination of 3 axes that are readily available intraoperatively (the Whiteside line, aTEA, and PCA+3°ER) differed from the sTEA by a mean of 1.80° ± 0.70°. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest study of its kind, analysis of CT scans of 2,128 femora revealed that no 1 axis could serve as a marker of femoral component rotation with both high accuracy and low variability. Utilizing a combination of 3 methods (PCA+3°ER, the Whiteside or sulcus line, and aTEA) to maximize accuracy and sex and ethnic generalizability when positioning the femoral component is recommended. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A large-scale study using a CT-based biomorphometric database demonstrated that use of a combination of 3 axes (PCA+3°ER, the Whiteside or sulcus line, and aTEA) was the optimal strategy for judging femoral component rotation.